# Stash vs 心潮动态心智系统

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | 心潮动态心智系统 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 13 311 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +301 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; 心潮动态心智系统 needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [心潮动态心智系统](https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-xinchao-dynamic-mind