Stashvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stash | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +298 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
Stash details →wyoming-piper details →