# Stash vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-wraft