# Stash vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; WPS Office needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-wps-office