# Stash vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 ✓ | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-woodpecker-ci