# Stash vs Winter CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | Winter CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 309 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +299 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 7 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [Winter CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-winter-cms