Stashvswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stash | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 307 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +301 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).
Stash details →wanderer details →