Stashvs墨台 · VibeHolding
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stash | 墨台 · VibeHolding | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 309 | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +299 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; 墨台 · VibeHolding needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
Stash details →墨台 · VibeHolding details →