# Stash vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-uusec-waf