# Stash vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +298 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-url-to-png