# Stash vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 309 ✓ | 11 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +299 ✓ | +47 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; unopim needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-unopim