# Stash vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; uMap needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-umap