# Stash vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-tunesynctool