# Stash vs trusted-cgi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | trusted-cgi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 13 308 ✓ | 249 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 45/100 for trusted-cgi, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for trusted-cgi.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [trusted-cgi](https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-trusted-cgi