# Stash vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stash | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 309 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +299 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stash-vs-trip2g