Standard Notesvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Standard Notes | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 685 | 17 955 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 | +58 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 29 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 75/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
Standard Notes details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with