# Standard Notes vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Standard Notes | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 6 685 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.

Standard Notes is growing faster right now (+53 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/standard-notes-vs-urbit