# Standard Notes vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Standard Notes | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 686 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

Standard Notes ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.

Standard Notes is growing faster right now (+53 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/standard-notes-vs-upptime