Standard NotesvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Standard Notes | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 6 685 | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.
Standard Notes ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
Standard Notes is growing faster right now (+53 stars in 30 days).
Standard Notes details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with