# Stalwart Mail Server vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Stalwart Mail Server | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 16 in Mail Server | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 15 484 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +681 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only AND LicenseRef-SEL | — |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Stalwart Mail Server scores 79/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Stalwart Mail Server ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

Stalwart Mail Server is growing faster right now (+681 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Stalwart Mail Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/stalwart-mail-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stalwart-mail-server.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/stalwart-mail-server-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api