SSH & Web TerminalvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SSH & Web Terminal | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 104 in Home Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 542 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, SSH & Web Terminal is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
SSH & Web Terminal is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
SSH & Web Terminal details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep SSH & Web Terminal, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with