# SSH & Web Terminal vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SSH & Web Terminal | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #30 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 542 | 93 036 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +1 289 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 19 |
| Latest release | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; SSH & Web Terminal needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SSH & Web Terminal](https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ssh-web-terminal-vs-uptime-kuma