# SSH & Web Terminal vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SSH & Web Terminal | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #30 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 542 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.

SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; SSH & Web Terminal needs more configuration.

SSH & Web Terminal is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SSH & Web Terminal](https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ssh-web-terminal-vs-upptime