SSH & Web Terminalvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SSH & Web Terminal | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 542 | 114 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +3 551 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 8 |
| Latest release | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, SSH & Web Terminal is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 551 stars in 30 days).
SSH & Web Terminal details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep SSH & Web Terminal, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with