SRSvsTypeType
Two self-hosted Media Server projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +111 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
SRS details →TypeType details →All Media Server projects →
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with