# SRS vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SRS | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +111 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/srs-vs-tunesynctool