SRSvsTryton
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | Tryton | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +111 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | — |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 68/100 for Tryton, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tryton.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; Tryton needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep Tryton, compare it with