SRSvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 | 712 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +111 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 4 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
SRS details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with