# SRS vs tg-spam

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SRS | tg-spam |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 4 in Anti-Spam |
| GitHub stars | 29 392 ✓ | 454 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.29.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 52/100 for tg-spam, so it is the safer default.

tg-spam ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

If you want the quickest setup, tg-spam is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)
- [tg-spam](https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-spam) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-spam.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/srs-vs-tg-spam