# SRS vs Terraforming Mars

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SRS | Terraforming Mars |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 14 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 ✓ | 961 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 62/100 for Terraforming Mars, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Terraforming Mars.

SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)
- [Terraforming Mars](https://selfhost.directory/project/terraforming-mars) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/terraforming-mars.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/srs-vs-terraforming-mars