# SRS vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SRS | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 ✓ | 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/srs-vs-syncwatch