# SRS vs swarm-cronjob

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SRS | swarm-cronjob |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 ✓ | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +111 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for swarm-cronjob.

If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)
- [swarm-cronjob](https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/srs-vs-swarm-cronjob