# SRS vs subatic

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SRS | subatic |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #31 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 29 389 ✓ | 162 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +112 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 40/100 for subatic, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for subatic.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; subatic needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)
- [subatic](https://selfhost.directory/project/subatic) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subatic.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/srs-vs-subatic