# SRS vs storj

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SRS | storj |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 29 392 ✓ | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.

storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)
- [storj](https://selfhost.directory/project/storj) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/storj.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/srs-vs-storj