# sprout-track vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sprout-track | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 398 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 1.6.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 48/100 for sprout-track, so it is the safer default.

sprout-track ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; sprout-track needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sprout-track](https://selfhost.directory/project/sprout-track) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sprout-track.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sprout-track-vs-workout-cool