# spotify-saver vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | spotify-saver | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 169 | 17 187 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.

spotify-saver ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; spotify-saver needs more configuration.

Upptime is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [spotify-saver](https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spotify-saver-vs-upptime