# spotify-saver vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | spotify-saver | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 169 | 114 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 538 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for spotify-saver.

If you want the quickest setup, spotify-saver is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [spotify-saver](https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spotify-saver-vs-supabase