spotify-savervssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spotify-saver | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 169 | 114 286 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 538 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 8 |
| Latest release | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for spotify-saver.
If you want the quickest setup, spotify-saver is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 538 stars in 30 days).
spotify-saver details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep spotify-saver, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with