spiderfootvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spiderfoot | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 23 954 | 2 919 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 478 | +120 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 64/100 for Zot Registry, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spiderfoot.
spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 478 stars in 30 days).
spiderfoot details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep spiderfoot, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with