# spiderfoot vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | spiderfoot | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 030 ✓ | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 538 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [spiderfoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/spiderfoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spiderfoot.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spiderfoot-vs-zookeeper