# spiderfoot vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | spiderfoot | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 23 938 ✓ | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 462 ✓ | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spiderfoot.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; spiderfoot needs more configuration.

spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 462 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [spiderfoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/spiderfoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spiderfoot.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spiderfoot-vs-workout-cool