# spiderfoot vs wlgblock

> Two self-hosted [Security projects](https://selfhost.directory/security), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | spiderfoot | wlgblock |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 34/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #72 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 24 019 ✓ | 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 527 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 34/100 for wlgblock, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, spiderfoot is easier to run; wlgblock needs more configuration.

spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 527 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [spiderfoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/spiderfoot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spiderfoot.md)
- [wlgblock](https://selfhost.directory/project/wlgblock) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wlgblock.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/spiderfoot-vs-wlgblock