spiderfootvswlgblock
Two self-hosted Security projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spiderfoot | wlgblock | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 34/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #72 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 24 019 | 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 527 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 34/100 for wlgblock, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, spiderfoot is easier to run; wlgblock needs more configuration.
spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 527 stars in 30 days).
spiderfoot details →wlgblock details →All Security projects →
Swap a project
Keep spiderfoot, compare it with
Keep wlgblock, compare it with