spiderfootvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spiderfoot | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 23 975 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 499 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spiderfoot.
If you want the quickest setup, spiderfoot is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 499 stars in 30 days).
spiderfoot details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep spiderfoot, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with