Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-GrafanavsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →Windows ARM details →