Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-GrafanavsWeKnora
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | WeKnora | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 35 810 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +937 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.3 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
WeKnora scores 83/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
WeKnora ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; WeKnora needs more configuration.
WeKnora is growing faster right now (+937 stars in 30 days).
Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →WeKnora details →