Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-GrafanavsViseron
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | Viseron | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 3 670 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 17 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Viseron scores 70/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Viseron ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Viseron needs more configuration.
Viseron is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).
Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →Viseron details →