Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-GrafanavsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
UUSEC WAF is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).
Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →UUSEC WAF details →