# Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 5 278 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

Umbraco CMS is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana-vs-umbraco-cms