# Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 33/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 144 | 65 400 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +459 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 87/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Traefik needs more configuration.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+459 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana-vs-traefik